Community Forums > Voobly Community > Age of Empires II: The Conquerors > Custom Scenario > Scenario Design > Scenario Design Questions > CBA HERO v18
22 Kullanıcı(lar) Bu sayfaya bakıyor (30 dakika içinde)
0 üye, 22 ziyaretçi
0 üye, 22 ziyaretçi
현재 가장 인기있는 포스트들:
Word Association (66 유저)
AoKTS updates (42 유저)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (42 유저)
1.6 reward campaing (40 유저)
TIW 2020 Map votes (24 유저)
CBA HERO v18 (21 유저)
이번주 가장 활발한 글:
TDII TeamBonus V4A2 (13 포스트)
Why will this error occur while ... (10 포스트)
$200 HEROFEST 1v1 TOURNAMENT by ... (10 포스트)
Voobly crash (8 포스트)
Again the same problem (3 포스트)
like
Portugues Organ Gun (siege unit)
Khmer Ballista Elephant (siege unit)
Malay Karambit Warrior (half pop trash unit)
Bulgarians Konnik (Respawns as Dismounted Konnik upon death - each death gives enemy kills)
Burgundians Coustillier (Charges attack every 40 seconds - does this ability even work on voobly?)
Bohemians Hussite Wagon (you can imagine the camping with this type of unit)
that's just a few. you'd be better off just making up your own units, because what they came up with is ****ed.
Ive been trying for years....
so if we wanna come up with something new we have to edit cba hero map itself
since it will be more ez to get kills now for cage ..also it ez to get kills after 200 so yea 400 for imp
but idk
we must all contribute
so if we wanna come up with something new we have to edit cba hero map itself
also limiting bbts to avoid bbt spam ..
toughts ?
or celts aztec franks and viking vs teuton persia mongol and maya? (last 2 games)
its mind boggling you think it can be balanced.
tenchy isnt the only creator infact i won the both scenario contests but people still insist on cba.
or celts aztec franks and viking vs teuton persia mongol and maya? (last 2 games)
its mind boggling you think it can be balanced.
tenchy isnt the only creator infact i won the both scenario contests but people still insist on cba.
These adjustments only raise the balance ratio
or celts aztec franks and viking vs teuton persia mongol and maya? (last 2 games)
its mind boggling you think it can be balanced.
tenchy isnt the only creator infact i won the both scenario contests but people still insist on cba.
saracens +25
span +20
mongol +15
turk +12
pers +10
etc etc
and then give the team with worse civ some bonus to reduce the unfairness of the match up
lets say
team 1
saracens (+25)
persians (+10)
turks (+12)
celts (0)
team 2
goth (0)
aztec (0)
vik (0)
mongols (+15)
net rating difference
0-10 = leave it as it
10-25 = give 1 player on team w/ weaker civs archer of the eye from the start
25-50 = give 1 player archer of the eyes + give another player vil from start
just an idea but would make games more fair
or this https://www.voobly.com/forum/thread/229278
or this https://www.voobly.com/forum/thread/176585
or this https://www.voobly.com/forum/thread/333197
i assure you they are more fun than cba
its not good in my opinion and experience,
China 250 cage is fine,
imp should not be 550,
like
Portugues Organ Gun (siege unit)
Khmer Ballista Elephant (siege unit)
Malay Karambit Warrior (half pop trash unit)
Bulgarians Konnik (Respawns as Dismounted Konnik upon death - each death gives enemy kills)
Burgundians Coustillier (Charges attack every 40 seconds - does this ability even work on voobly?)
Bohemians Hussite Wagon (you can imagine the camping with this type of unit)
that's just a few. you'd be better off just making up your own units, because what they came up with is ****ed.
The idea is to port the maps to the new patch, but without supporting the new civs. We simply use existing civs twice.